Carrier v. State Administrative Board
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Ingham; Collingwood (Charles B.), J. Bill by M. Ralph Carrier and others against the State administrative board of the State of Michigan and others to enjoin the expenditure of certain money. From an order denying a motion to dismiss, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING.
STATES — ALLEGATIONS SUFFICIENT FOR EQUITABLE RELIEF — MOOT QUESTION.
On rehearing it is held, that the bill was filed by proper parties plaintiff, that it stated a case for equitable relief, and that it was not open to attack on motion to dismiss, per McDONALD, CLARK, BIRD, SHARPE, and MOORE, JJ.; but that by the passage of Act No. 311, Pub. Acts 1923, after the filing of the bill, the questions involved have become moot, and that the bill should therefore be dismissed, per WIEST, C.J., FELLOWS. McDONALD, CLARK, BIRD, and STEERE, JJ.
I have not reached the conclusion stated by Mr.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Miller v. GrandyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by6 opinions
- Menendez v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Bacon v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Baldwin Manor, Inc. v. City of BirminghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Thomson v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Wolgamood v. Village of ConstantineMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.