Legal Opinion

Ulen Contracting Corp. v. Tri-County Electric Cooperative

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 6, 1940No. 71PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND, District Judge.

Subsequent to the motion by defendant for judgment upon the pleadings under Rule 12(c), Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, an amended complaint was filed by leave of court. The motion must be disposed of upon the amended pleadings. See Grubbs v. Smith, 6 Cir., 86 F.2d 275; Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co., 9 Cir., 106 F.2d 769.

It is well settled that a judgment should not be rendered on the pleadings unless the right thereto is clear. Such a motion admits the truth of all well pleaded facts in the pleadings of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  2. Kadylak v. O'BRIENDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Grubbs v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  4. Chandler v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
  5. Texas Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boulger v. WoodsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
  2. Mehr v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  3. Moore v. StangeDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API