Legal Opinion

Texas Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 1918No. 5528PublishedCited by 1 opinion

At Law. Action by the Texas Company against the Atlantic Refining Company. On motion by plaintiff for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defense.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This rule might be disposed of by an order simply allowing or refusing judgment. A “decent respect,” however, for the opposing views of the patties and their counsel, who have discussed the questions involved with marked ability and clearness and brought to the aid of the court the fruit of much labor expended upon the preparation and presentation of their respective views, as well as the large sum involved, impels us to set forth with fullness the reasons which lead us to the conclusion reached.

The following general observations will show the grounds of the ruling…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Erie City v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ulen Contracting Corp. v. Tri-County Electric CooperativeDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API