Starnes Ex Rel. Starnes v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
When the defendant moves for a directed verdict after the presentation of plaintiff’s evidence, the question presented for the court is whether the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, is sufficient for submission to the jury. Sink v. Sink, 11 N.C. App. 549, 181 S.E. 2d 721 (1971). Thus our sole task on review is to determine whether the trial judge properly decided this question with respect to ■each of the three defendants.
Dependant Hospital
In open court the parties agreed to the following stipulations: (1) that defendant Hospital is a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rabon v. Rowan Memorial Hospital IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Randolph Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Emory University v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Payne v. GarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Sink v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
3Cited by14 opinions
- Blanton v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Bost v. RileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Parker v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Harris v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- Franklin v. GuptaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.