Legal Opinion

Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Randolph Hospital, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1953No. 596PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

It is settled law in this jurisdiction that a charitable institution may not be held liable to a beneficiary of the charity for the negligence of its servants or employees if it has exercised due care in their selection and retention. Barden v. R. R., 152 N.C. 318, 67 S.E. 971; Hoke v. Glenn, 167 N.C. 594, 83 S.E. 807; Herndon v. Massey, 217 N.C. 610, 8 S.E. 2d 914; Johnson v. Hospital, 196 N.C. 610, 146 S.E. 573; Smith v. Duke University, 219 N.C. 628, 14 S.E. 2d 643. It is to be noted that the rule to which we adhere holds a charitable institution liable for failure to exercise due care in…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Weston's Administratrix v. Hospital of St. VincentSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. Downes v. Harper HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Powers v. Massachusetts Homœopathic HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1901
  5. Wharton v. WarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1913

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rabon v. Rowan Memorial Hospital IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Bulova Watch Co. v. Brand Distributors of North Wilkesboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Sides v. Cabarrus Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Muller v. Nebraska Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Schulte v. Missionaries of LaSalette Corp. of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API