Legal Opinion

Sink v. Sink

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 23, 1971No. 7121DC379PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

In the judgment appealed from the trial judge made findings of fact. The motion for a directed verdict in a jury trial presents the question whether the evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to the party against whom the motion is made, was sufficient for submission to the jury. “In resolving this question, it was not required or appropriate that the trial court make ‘Findings of Fact’ and state ‘Conclusions of Law.5 To pass upon the single question of law presented, namely, the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence to withstand defendant’s motion for a directed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. L. Harvey and Son Co. v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Starnes Ex Rel. Starnes v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Penney v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Bray v. DailCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Thompson v. SolesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API