Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Beatty v. Rhodes

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1867PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Hon. C. N. Harris, Judge of the Third Judicial District, presiding.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Hon. C. N. Harris, Judge of the Third Judicial District, presiding. The relator’s petition for mandamus was as follows: “ H. O. Beatty, of said county, being duly sworn, says that at the general election held in and for the State of Nevada, on the first Tuesday next after the first Monday in November, a.d. 1864, being the eighth day of said month, he was duly elected one of the Justices of the Supreme Court of said State; that afterwards, to wit: on the day of in said year, it was duly determined by lot, in accordance with the…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Lewis, J., Johnson, J.,

concurring.

Upon the first argument of this case I confess I was fully of the opinion that the writ ought to issue, but after further and more mature consideration, I am satisfied my first conclusion was incorrect. Nor do I hesitate to say that I entered upon the examination of the case with a desire to grant the peremptory writ, if it could be done upon correct legal principles; because we all know it was the general understanding, not only among the first State officers, but among the people at large, that the salaries of such officers would be payable in…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. CITY OF FERNLEY VS. STATE, DEP'T OF TAXATIONNevada Supreme Court · 2016
  2. CITY OF FERNLEY VS. STATE, DEP'T OF TAXATIONNevada Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Seaborn v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. Miller v. LaniNevada Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Thomas v. Nev. Yellow Cab Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API