Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Miller v. Lani

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933No. 3037Published

1Dissent

It is a common provision in the constitutions of most, if not all, of the states, that the salary of a public officer shall not be increased or diminished during his term. Such a provision is to be found in the constitution of Nevada. Article 15, sec. 9. The consensus of opinion is that the provision is wise, mandatory, inexorable, admits of no exceptions, and affords no opportunity for evasion, directly or indirectly, by legislatures or courts. 46 C.J. 1021; 22 R.C.L. 434; 23 Amer. Eng. Encyc. of Law (2d ed.) 401. It is generally conceded that the purpose of the constitutional prohibition,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. County Commissioners v. MonnettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Evans v. JobNevada Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Straughan v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Commonwealth v. MoffittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Crawford v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API