Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Seaborn v. First Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1934No. 3054-3060Published

1Concurrence

These combined proceedings in prohibition, initiated in this court on the petitions of Edward J. Seaborn, as superintendent of banks of Nevada, against the respondent court and judge thereof, may be said to be the culmination of bitter controversy between certain depositors and creditors of the so-called Wingfield banks who favor their liquidation by the superintendent of banks and those who favor their liquidation through receiverships. As between the contestants, I wish to make it plain that this court will not undertake to decide which is the best method of procedure. I also wish to make…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McComb v. Fourth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Millar v. Western Union Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Walser v. MoranNevada Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ewing v. HarriesUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State ex rel. Beatty v. RhodesNevada Supreme Court · 1867

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API