Legal Opinion
Liss v. Seamark Foods
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 20, 2001No. COA00-1306PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Chief Judge.
Saul Guy Liss (“plaintiff’) moved to amend the complaint in his negligence and breach of warranty action to correct the name of “Seamark Enterprises, Inc.” (“defendant”) and for the amendment to relate back to the filing of the original complaint. The trial court granted plaintiffs Rule 15 motion to amend. The trial court granted defendant’s Rule 12(b) motion to dismiss in accordance with Crossman v. Moore, 341 N.C. 185, 459 S.E.2d 715 (1995) and Bob Killian Tire, Inc. v. Day Enters., Inc., 131 N.C. App. 330, 506 S.E.2d 752 (1998). Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ober v. HiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Tyson v. L'Eggs Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Crossman v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- Franklin v. Winn Dixie Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Rogerson v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charlot v. Ecolab, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Pierce v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Barnes v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Williams v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Reece v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.