Legal Opinion

Reece v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 2008No. COA07-368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss because plaintiff’s amended complaint was not filed within the statute of limitations. Plaintiff appeals. The dispositive question before this Court is whether plaintiff’s amended complaint should relate back to the date of her initial complaint. For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. Background

On or about 2 April 2003, plaintiff was driving a 1995 Ford motor vehicle east on RP 1338 in Buncombe County, North Carolina. At the same time, defendant Robert Neil Smith (“Robert”) was driv ing a 1990 Mazda motor vehicle in a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harrold v. DowdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Crossman v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Pierce v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Liss v. Seamark FoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Crawford v. BoyetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Estate of Tallman v. City of GastoniaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Boyd v. SANDLINGCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Reece v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API