Guardianship of Reynolds
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This appeal is from an order of the trial court regulating the control of the minor by his guardian and paternal grandfather, C. F. Reynolds. The order provided that respondents, Dr. and Mrs. Landis, the maternal grandparents, should have the right of and custody of said minor from 9 o’clock a. m. each Saturday until 10 o’clock a. m. the following Sunday; that they should have the right to visit said minor in the home of the guardian at reasonable times and upon such reasonable notice as the guardian might require, and the further right to take the minor on two vacations during each summer,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Baker v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Crater v. CraterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Browne v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Titcomb v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Supreme Court · 1934
- People Ex Rel. Pruyne v. . WaltsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. LeskeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Cooper v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.