Legal Opinion
Ray v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided January 30, 1970PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Justice.
After non-jury trial, the defendant was found guilty of robbery. The facts relevant to the various grounds of this appeal will be stated as each ground is discussed.
I
The defendant was not arraigned. It is argued, on the basis of State v. Trabbold, Del.Super., 8 Terry 391, 91 A.2d 537 (1952), that the Superior Court committed error fatal to the conviction by reason of its failure to arraign the defendant.
It appears that, prior to the commencement of the trial, the defendant’s attorney filed the required notice 1 of the defend ant’s intent to enter a plea of not guilty by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- Lank v. SteinerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KostkaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Commonwealth v. KeitaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Fairfield Builders, Inc. v. VattilanaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.