Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Goodyear Service Store

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 7, 1986No. 112, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

We shall hold in this case that an appeal to the circuit court of the amount of an attorney’s fee in a workmen’s compensation case is not to be tried de novo. We also shall hold that under the circumstances of this case the Workmen’s Compensation Commission is entitled to appear as an appellee in the circuit court, the Court of Special Appeals, and this Court. Hence, we shall affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals in Mitchell v. Goodyear Service Store, 63 Md.App. 426, 492 A.2d 984 (1985). We disagree with its conclusion relative to the Commission, however.

I

John D.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  2. Schemmel v. T. B. Gatch & Sons Contracting & Building Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Queen v. AggerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Smith v. State Roads Commission & State Accident FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. R. H. Frazier & Son v. LeasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Morris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. St. Onge, Stewart, Johnson & Reens, LLC v. Media Group, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Engel & Engel, P.A. v. IngermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Workers' Compensation Commission v. MayCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API