Legal Opinion
United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Driver
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 5, 2012No. Case No. 8:09-cv-00578-ODW(RZx)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [99]
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) brings this civil enforcement action alleging that Defendant Gordon Driver (in part through his corporate vehicles Axcess Automation LLC and Axcess Fund Management LLC) operated a Ponzi scheme1 from February 2006 through May 2009. Throughout the course of the scheme, Driver allegedly solicited at least $14.3 million from over 100 participants in the United States and Canada to participate in commodity pools to trade…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. McDonnellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. ArringtonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2014
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Allied Markets LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. HallDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2014
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.