Folds v. Allardt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
In each case the defendant Allardt appeals from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, refusing to open a judgment entered on default.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
These cases all present substantially the same question. Judgment was obtained by default against the defendant upon a'partnership indebtedness for goods sold to him and one Willard, associated together as partners in business. He claims to have been an infant when the debt was contracted, and when the judgment was rendered, but does not deny that the partnership incurred the indebtedness, or that the goods were received and are worth the sum claimed. After judgment a guardian ad litem was appointed for him in the several actions, and an application was duly made upon affidavits to set aside…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kemp v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
- Conrad v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Todd v. ClappMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Jaques v. SaxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frank Spangler Co. v. HauptSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- McMahon v. German-American National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Kuehl v. MeansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928