Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Kantrowitz
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Defendants Cecelia K. Kantrowitz and Reuben B. Kantrowitz seek to have made absolute an order procured by them requiring complainant to show cause why the decrees, pro confesso and final, regularly entered in a foreclosure suit should not be vacated and opened for the purpose of affording them an opportunity to file an answer and interpose their defense.
It appears from the affidavits here submitted that the bill of complaint was filed on August 9th, 1935, subpoena to answer was on September 30th, 1935, duly served on said defendants, and the time for filing of answer, expiring on October…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McKee v. VernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Boyer v. BoyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1910
- Avidan v. KaplanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Carpenter v. MuchmoreNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862
- Day v. AllaireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1879
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Marsh v. VetterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979