Legal Opinion

Avidan v. Kaplan

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 16, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On December 30th, 1929, complainant filed a bill in this court against the defendants praying that they answer and make discovery of who has possessed the premises and received the rents, issues and profits since a pretended conveyance therein set forth; that the conveyance from Fradkin Rothberg, Incorporated, to Samuel Kaplan, and all other fraudulent conveyances affecting the lands might be set aside and held to be fraudulent and void as against the bankrupt corporation; that defendants be decreed to pay complainant, as trustee, for the benefit of the creditors of the corporation, the full…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re McCravenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
  2. Carpenter v. MuchmoreNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862
  3. Sandford v. WellbornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schulwitz v. ShusterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Kaffitz v. ClawsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  3. Etz v. WeinmannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. Pinckney v. Hudson County National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  5. Morris County B. L. Assn. v. WaltersNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API