Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Muchmore

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1862PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The defendant, by petition, asks that the decree, entered in this cause on the twenty-third of August last, be opened, and that he be admitted to answer. There is no suggestion that the decree and the proceedings upon which it is founded are not in all respects regular.

The general rule is, that a decree regularly entered and enrolled cannot be altered, except by bill of revivor. 2 Daniell’s Ch. Pr. 1232, 1235, and cases cited in note 4; 1 Barbour’s Ch. Pr. 366.

Great liberality has been exercised in the opening and correcting of decrees before enrollment, and even afterwards,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tradesmens Nat. Bank and Trust Co. v. CummingsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Loranger v. AlbanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Avidan v. KaplanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  5. Finkel v. Cumberland Realty Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API