United States v. Harms
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Dennis Richard Harms appeals from the district court’s denial of his § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a) and for the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
Background
In December 2000, Mr. Harms pled guilty in district court to a two-count indictment charging him with (1) using a computer linked to the internet to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), and (2) receipt of child pornography that was transported in interstate commerce by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. SimsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Malicoat v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Stanko v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. MoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.