Legal Opinion

United States v. Harms

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 10, 2004No. 03-6231PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Dennis Richard Harms appeals from the district court’s denial of his § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a) and for the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Background

In December 2000, Mr. Harms pled guilty in district court to a two-count indictment charging him with (1) using a computer linked to the internet to entice a minor to engage in sexual activity, 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b), and (2) receipt of child pornography that was transported in interstate commerce by…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. SimsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  3. Malicoat v. MullinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Stanko v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. MoyaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API