Legal Opinion

Rick v. Murphy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1959No. 165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Defendant Murphy’s motion to nonsuit was over ruled. This he assigns as error. Plaintiff’s evidence does not tend to establish that Murphy was the owner of the vehicle operated by Froneberger. To the contrary, it shows that the driver was the owner. It was registered in his name and carried license plates issued to him. This made a 'prima facie case of ownership. G.S. 20-71.1 (b). True the body was not the same as the body described on the registration card, but the body is merely a part of the motor vehicle referred to in the statute, G.S. 20-71.1.

By definition, G.S. 20-38 (p), a motor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Fox v. HopkinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  3. Spake v. . PearlmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atkins v. MoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Merchants Distributors, Inc. v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API