Legal Opinion
Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S.A. Glas, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided September 16, 1996No. 1:95-mj-00813PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
SCHELL, Chief Judge.
Before the court are Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs filed a collective response. Thereafter, two Defendants filed replies, and Plaintiffs again filed a response. Upon consideration of the motions, responses, replies, and memoranda of law, this court is of the opinion that Defendants’ motions to dismiss should be granted in part and denied in part.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs have sued Defendants for…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S. Auto Glass Discount Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Compuspa, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S.A. GLAS, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1998
- Kadco Contract Design Corp. v. Kelly Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1998
- Ortiz v. Citimortgage, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.