Legal Opinion

State v. Huffmeyer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2001No. 70194-6PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridge, J.

The trial court dismissed criminal charges against Chad T. Huffmeyer because the State had failed to bring him to trial within 104 days of the information as required by CrR 3.3(c)(1) and State v. Striker, 87 Wn.2d 870, 557 P.2d 847 (1976). We are asked to determine whether CrR 3.3(g)(2)’s exclusion from speedy trial calculation of the period during trial on another matter includes the period between a guilty plea and sentencing. We hold that it does not. We are also asked to determine whether the State exercised good faith and due diligence in attempting *55to promptly bring Huffmeyer before…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. PachecoWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. AlexusWashington Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. GeorgeWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. City of Seattle v. GuayWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. City of Seattle v. GuayWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. ChhomWashington Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API