Legal Opinion

People v. Barrera

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1993No. F017322PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILDNER, J. *

Introduction

On June 5, 1990, the electorate adopted Proposition 115, the “Crime Victims Justice Reform Act.” (Raven v. Deukmejian (1990) 52 Cal.3d 336, 340 [276 Cal.Rptr. 326, 801 P.2d 1077].) Among its avowed purposes, as stated in the preamble, was “ . . to create a system ... in which violent criminals receive just punishment, . . .’ ” (Id. at p. 342.) Toward that end, Penal Code 1 section 206, defining the crime of torture, and section 206.1, prescribing its punishment, were enacted.

Section 206 provides:

“Every person who, with the intent to cause cruel or extreme pain…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. PreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Ramos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API