People v. Barrera
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILDNER, J. *
Introduction
On June 5, 1990, the electorate adopted Proposition 115, the “Crime Victims Justice Reform Act.” (Raven v. Deukmejian (1990) 52 Cal.3d 336, 340 [276 Cal.Rptr. 326, 801 P.2d 1077].) Among its avowed purposes, as stated in the preamble, was “ . . to create a system ... in which violent criminals receive just punishment, . . .’ ” (Id. at p. 342.) Toward that end, Penal Code 1 section 206, defining the crime of torture, and section 206.1, prescribing its punishment, were enacted.
Section 206 provides:
“Every person who, with the intent to cause cruel or extreme pain…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. JenningsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. PreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Ramos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.