Legal Opinion

Kalinowski v. Smith

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 29, 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeville, J.

In this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an accident involving a single car commuter train (a Budliner) of the New York, New *770Haven and Hartford Railroad, the motion of the defendant, trustee of the railroad, for a directed verdict was allowed at the close of the plaintiffs opening. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to that ruling.

"In ruling on a motion for a directed verdict on the opening, the judge must take all the statements in the opening as true, and in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and if any reasonable view of the facts…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pridgen v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  2. Francis L. Dobb, Etc. v. George P. BakerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  3. Brown v. KnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  4. Davies v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Gannett v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Owen v. MeserveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API