Legal Opinion

Pridgen v. Boston Housing Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 5, 1974PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuirico, J.

This is an action of tort in which Joseph Pridgen, a minor, seeks to recover from the Boston Housing Authority (the authority), the Consolidated Elevator Company (Consolidated) and the Westinghouse Electric Corporation (Westinghouse) for personal injuries sustained by him while he was trapped in the elevator shaft of a building owned by the authority. His mother, Minnie Lee Pridgen, seeks to recover from the same three defendants for consequential damages. Each plaintiff alleges in a separate count that Joseph’s injuries were caused (1) by the authority’s negligence, (2) by the authority’s…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Mounsey v. EllardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. WelanskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mullins v. Pine Manor CollegeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Irwin v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  5. Rhodes v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API