Legal Opinion
People v. Winborne
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander Chananau, J.
This motion to perpetuate testimony is disposed of as follows:
Pursuant to an order to show cause, dated March 24, 1977, a hearing was held to determine if the People’s motion to conditionally record the testimony of one Juan Menamirn, the complaining witness, on Indictment No. 2616/75, should be granted. The court having rendered its decision from the bench, the following constitutes the reasons for that decision.
It is alleged by the People that on or about August 4, 1975, the defendant, Noris Winborne, attempted, at knife point to steal a sum of money from Juan Menamirn. This charge is the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Colonial Times, Inc., D.B.A. The Daily Rag v. Honorable Oliver Gasch, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Carter v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States v. LaFatchDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
- Gotthelf v. Hillcrest Lumber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Rubino v. G. D. Searle & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. CrockettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. LambertyNew York Supreme Court · 1978