Legal Opinion

People v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The identification of defendant, while he was waiting to testify before the Grand Jury, was inadvertent, was not occasioned by improper conduct on the part of law enforcement officials and did not violate his right to due process (see, People v Logan, 25 NY2d 184, 193, cert denied 396 US 1020; see also, People v Collins, 60 NY2d 214, 218). Further, his right to counsel, which had attached (see, People v Samuels, 49 NY2d 218), was not violated since his attorney was present at the time the identification was made. In any event, his in-court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. LoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. People v. CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. WinborneNew York Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ready v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  2. People v. KnickerbockerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re Carlton M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API