Legal Opinion

Khalil-Ullah Al-Muhaymin v. Charlie Jones

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1990No. 88-5547PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from the dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions. The case was dismissed in the district court due to “improper venue.” Upon review, we conclude the district court was in error and reverse.

Plaintiffs are inmates in the custody of the Tennessee Department of Corrections. At the time of the filing of the complaint, they were incarcerated in different correctional facilities, one being in Morgan County, Tennessee, and the other in Bledsoe County, Tennessee. Fourteen persons were named as defendants. Thirteen of the defendants are to be found in Morgan County, and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sinwell, William v. Governor Milton Shapp, Governor of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Mothers & Childrens Rights Organization, Inc. v. StantonDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1973

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. DRFP, LLC v. Republica Bolivariana de VenezuelaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  2. Arnold v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. EMC Mortgage Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
  4. Arnold v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Blue Water Importers, Inc. v. BornDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API