Legal Opinion
State v. Judd
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided November 2, 1988No. 88-0430-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScott, C.J.
This appeal involves interpretation of the Wisconsin Organized Crime Control Act (WOC-CA), secs. 946.80 through 946.87, Stats. Winston Judd seeks a reversal of his conviction on the basis that sec. 946.83(3), Stats., requires the "enterprise” to be separate from the "person” who is charged with conducting a pattern of racketeering activity through the enterprise. He alleges that the evidence is insufficient on this point. While we agree that the enterprise must be separate from the person, we conclude that sufficient evidence supports such a finding in this case. We therefore affirm Judd’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Harry Aleman and Leonard ForestaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. George I. BennyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. O'CONNELLCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- State v. EversCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Brunswick Corp. v. E.A. Doyle Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1991
- Martinez v. CalimlimDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
- Johnson v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.