Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 20, 2013No. 13-cv-144-wmcPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

WILLIAM M. CONLEY, District Judge.

Defendant Bankers Life and Casualty Company (“Bankers”), through its authorized agents, sold an individual retirement annuity to plaintiff Heather Johnson and her now-deceased husband. Plaintiff alleges that she and her husband purchased this annuity, which replaced an existing annuity purchased from another company, *952because it contained an “annuity income preservation amendment rider” which Bankers represented would keep both the annuity and income from the annuity from affecting their “Medicaid eligibility and spend down…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Santiago v. WallsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Hecker v. Deere & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Cedric Kushner Promotions, Ltd. v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Metavante Corp. v. Emigrant Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Birch REA Partners Inc v. BrombacherDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  2. Environmental Hydrogeological Consultants, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023
  3. Sosa v. Onfido, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API