Legal Opinion
United States v. Hayden
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1996No. 94-5861, 94-5871 and 94-5877PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in part and reversed in part by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge RUSSELL joined.
OPINION
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
A jury convicted Reginald Hayden, James Hayden, and Tomel Lucas (collectively “the defendants”) of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute crack cocaine, among other drug-related offenses. The defendants appeal their convictions and sentences on various grounds. We affirm all convictions and sentences, with the exception of James Hayden’s conviction and sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) for using or…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- United States v. Roland Demingo Queen, A/K/A MingoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Wayne Morris MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. James DinkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Michael SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. David RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.