Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 27, 2019No. 16-4746; 16-4764; 16-4765PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDSON, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Mark Bazemore, Michael Smith, Jr., and Timothy Hurtt participated in the illegal activities of a Baltimore street and prison gang known as the Black Guerrilla Family. Their involvement in the gang's drug dealing and acts of violence led to their convictions. The Defendants seek to reverse those convictions for two main reasons. First, they argue the district court improperly handled the fears some jurors expressed to the court after learning of this gang's predilection for violence and retaliation. Second, they claim the district court should have excluded…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. United States v. Pedro GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Lee ElbazCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  3. State of Iowa v. Lee Samuel ChristensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  4. T.H.E. Insurance Company v. Melyndia DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  5. United States v. James Maarvin HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API