Legal Opinion

State v. Monroe

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 25, 1990No. 89-60267; CA A60588PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for failure to perform the duties of a driver. ORS SllNOOllHa). She first challenges the statute as unconstitutional and also assigns error to the trial court’s failure to give a requested jury instruction. We reject the first assignment and reverse on the second.

Defendant was involved in a two-car accident that caused damage to the other car. She testified that she stopped at the scene of the accident, drove across the intersection, and then stopped again. According to defendant, she looked around, did not see the other car, and believed that it had left the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. BouknightSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. KellOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jennings v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. HulseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. HamlettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. Van WalchrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. State v. WhitesideCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API