State v. Hamlett
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Defendant was convicted, after a trial to the court on stipulated facts, of failure to perform the duties of a driver toward injured persons. ORS 811.705. On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in its pretrial ruling that the state was not required to prove that defendant knew that a person was injured in an accident from which he left the scene. We affirm.
Defendant, while driving his car, turned left in front of an approaching motorcycle. Defendant struck the side of the motorcycle, hitting the driver’s foot. The driver was able to maintain her balance and did not fall or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. WimberOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. RutleyOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HvalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. WierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. ReigardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- City of Beaverton v. PackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Hazen v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.