Legal Opinion

Consolidated Printing & Publishing Co. v. Allen

California Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1941No. L. A. 17878PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN, J., pro tem.

Petitioner is a taxpayer and property owner in the county of Los Angeles, and is also the owner and publisher of The Los Angeles Daily Journal, a daily newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in that county. Respondent is the purchasing agent of the county of Los Angeles.

In February, 1941, as such purchasing agent, respondent prepared specifications for the publication of all notices and for all advertising of said county and its departments, including the publication of the delinquent tax list, addenda, and indices for the year 1940, and requested bids for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Pacific Palisades Ass'n v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Doughterty v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Welsh v. BramletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hollman v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Board of Education v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Great American Indemnity Co. v. Gobierno de la CapitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
  4. McGlothlen v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API