Legal Opinion
United States Hoffman MacHinery Corp. v. Pantex Pressing MacH., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 11, 1930No. 4334, 4375PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court holding claims 2 and 5 of United States letters patent No. 1,193,093 valid and infringed and claims 2 and 4 of United States letters patent No. 1,326,982 invalid for want of invention.
Patent No. 1,193,093, issued to Benjamin Weinberger August 1, 1916, relates to improvements in garment-pressing machines, and more particularly to an air-suction drier to a garment press, which consists of a fixed bed or buck on which the garment to be pressed is laid, a pivoted head which comes down upon the buck to apply pressure to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Engine Safety Truck Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Roberts v. RyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Guardian Trust Co. v. Downingtown Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1928
3Cited by12 opinions
- Radtke Patents Corporation v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Hall v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Floridin Co. v. Attapulgus Clay Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- International Carbonic Engineering Co. v. Natural Carbonic Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.