Legal Opinion
Hall v. Wright
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1957No. 14626PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
On December 10, 1947, Jesse E. Hall, a citizen of the state of Texas, commenced this action against his competitors in the business of manufacturing and selling certain oil well bore cleaning devices. Named as defendants were Kenneth A. Wright, a citizen of the state of California, and B & W, Inc., a California corporation. Hall sought reformation of a certain contract, dated September 15, 1944, wherein the parties had attempted to resolve their differences. He also asked for a declaration of rights concerning the contract, as reformed; an injunction against asserted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Root Refining Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Gaudiosi v. MellonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
- Kendall-Jackson Winery, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Moon v. Cabot Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.