Legal Opinion

Nunnery v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 20, 1959Published

1Opinion of the Court

AVERT, P. J. (W. S.)

The question to be determined by this Court, in this cause, is whether or not "W. H. Fisher, counsel for original complainants, is entitled to any fees for his services rendered in this cause in addition to a fee of $250 paid to him in accord with the Decree so ordering, entered in this cause on March 27, 1950, and if he is entitled to any additional fee, the amount thereof.

*88The record indicates that the original bill was prepared in March, 1949 but was not filed in the Court until December, 1949. It seems unnecessary to a proper determination of the rights of the parties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Todd v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Spofford v. RoseTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Scott v. MarleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Pearson v. GillenwatersTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Vanhooser v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API