Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Gillenwaters

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

FROM HAWKINS. Appeal from Chancery Court of Hawkins County. A. T. Bowen, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This is a bill by the complainant, as administrator with the will annexed of Mrs. S. W. Burem, to pass his accounts and to sell land of which the testatrix died seized, for the payment of debts against her estate and the cost&p of administration. The defendant, J. U. Gillenwaters, is the residuary legatee and devisee, and the party mainly interested in the estate. The interest of the other parties will appear hereafter.

The Court of Chancery Appeals has heard the cause, and it is now before us on appeal by all the principal parties from such portions of the decree of the Court of Chancery…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. TinkhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Parker v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wallace v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Estate of Ladd v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
  3. Swaine v. HemphillMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Troughber v. AkinTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Vanhooser v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API