Legal Opinion · Dissent
In re Persky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 24, 1983Published
1DissentMurphy, P. J.
Respondent Persky moves for an order confirming the report of the Committee on Character and Fitness and reinstating him to the Bar. He was suspended, as of December 15, 1975, for a two-year period for knowingly filing a false 10K statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on behalf of Micro-thermal Applications, Inc. (Matter of Persky, 49 AD2d 353). The 10K statement listed about $500,000 in certificates of deposit which did not exist. He was convicted of filing a false report and of conspiracy to defraud in the purchase and sale of securities. Both convictions were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,494 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Harris A. Shapiro, Norman BermanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Wechsler v. BowmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- D. & C. Textile Corp. v. RudinNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Wechsler v. BowmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.