Legal Opinion

D. & C. Textile Corp. v. Rudin

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1964PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamuel J. Silverman, J.

This is a motion pursuant to rule 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) of the Civil Practice Law and Buies *917to dismiss the second amended complaint for failing to state a cause of action, and for summary judgment pursuant to subdivision (c) of rule 3211.

The first cause of action of the complaint attempts to allege a cause of action against the attorney defendants for conspiring to defraud the plaintiff of its rights under a contract entered into December 20,1960 with other named defendants. The cause of action fails to add anything material to the original and first amended complaints, both of which were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford & Rockwood v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1856

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Schott v. GloverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Waggoner v. Snow, Becker, Kroll, Klaris & KraussCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. Goldner v. Sullivan, Gough, Skipworth, Summers & SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API