State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Stuart
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Fountain. Circuit Court; Isaac E. Schoonover, Judge. Action by the State of Indiana, on the relation of the Board of Commissioners of the County of Fountain, against Charles F. Stuart. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
This is an action by appellant against ap? pellee, based upon alleged breaches of the official bond of appellee, Charles F. Stuart, who was auditor of Fountain county, Indiana, for a- term of four years, beginning on November 22, 1894. The complaint covered thirty-seven breaches of the bond. To the complaint, and to each separate breach therein set out, appellee filed a demurrer, which wás. overruled. Appellee answered in seven paragraphs, setting up the five-, six- and ten-year statutes of limitations, to which demurrers were overruled and exceptions taken. Judgment was rendered for appellee…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. Des Moines Navigation & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Johnson v. BlackSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
- Newsom v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- City of Pella v. ScholteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Board Cty. Com'rs Woodward Cty. v. WillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Sims v. CraigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Schuman v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.