Legal Opinion

Eagle Motor Lines, Inc. v. Hood

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1951No. 6 Div. 196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

On January 8, 1947, plaintiff’s intestate was killed in a collision of the car, in which he was riding as a passenger, with a truck parked on the highway at night, alleged to be without the required signals, flares or reflectors. The truck belonged to one Clements, who had charge of its operation. One Hawkins accompanied Clements on the truck.

The question of primary dispute was whether Clements was the agent of defendant. Hawkins made all the arrangements with respect to the transaction. Defendant, to whom we will refer as Eagle, was an irregular route carrier, engaged in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore-Handley Hardware Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Hawkins v. BarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Ex Parte RowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Booker v. United American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Tuskegee Institute v. May Refrigeration Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. State v. L. P. Gas Transport Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Stolmeier v. BeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. J & M ASSOCIATES, INC. v. CallahanDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API