Legal Opinion

Teamsters Union Local No. 115, of Philadelphia v. Desoto, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 19, 1984No. Nos. 83-5791, 83-5792PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

Teamsters Union Local No. 115 (“Union”) and DeSoto, Inc. (“DeSoto”) each appeal from an order of the district court enforcing in part a modified arbitrator’s award rendered under a collective bargaining agreement. We affirm the district court’s judgment but for reasons which differ from *933those of the district court.1 In doing so we do not disturb the modified arbitrator’s award.

I

DeSoto, a nationwide manufacturer of paint and industrial coatings, operated a plant in Pennsauken, New Jersey. The Union represents the production and maintenance employees at…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Teamsters Union Local No. 115, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Desoto, Inc., Pennsauken, New Jersey, Teamsters Union Local No. 115, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Affiliated With the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Desoto, Inc., Pennsauken, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API