Legal Opinion

State of Georgia v. Hamm

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 25, 1989No. A89A0844PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carley, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to OCGA § 16-13-49 (a) (4), the State filed a condemnation proceeding against a vehicle belonging to appellee. At a bench trial, the following evidence was adduced: Appellee met with an undercover agent. The agent agreed to follow in his vehicle as appellee drove to an apartment complex. At the apartment complex, appellee offered to sell the agent cocaine. When the agent accepted the offer, appellee entered one of the apartments. He returned with the cocaine and the sale was consummated in the agent’s vehicle. There was no evidence that any cocaine or other…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Kennery v. MostellerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Kahler v. KernesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. State v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hertz Corp. v. McCrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Bettis v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Lanier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. State of Georgia v. HammCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API