Legal Opinion

State of Georgia v. Hamm

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 25, 1989No. A89A0844Published

1Opinion of the Court

193 Ga. App. 184 (1989)

387 S.E.2d 344

STATE OF GEORGIA

v.

HAMM et al.

A89A0844.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided September 25, 1989.

Rehearing Denied October 16, 1989.

Robert E. Keller, District Attorney, Daniel J. Cahill, Jr., Lisa A. Curia, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellant.

Fowler, Hein & Daum, Douglas R. Daum, for appellees.

CARLEY, Chief Judge.

Pursuant to OCGA § 16-13-49 (a) (4), the State filed a condemnation proceeding against a vehicle belonging to appellee. At a bench trial, the following evidence was adduced: Appellee met with an undercover agent. The agent agreed to follow in…

Also in this document: Concurrence · McMurray; Concurrence · Beasley.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lang v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Kennery v. MostellerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Kahler v. KernesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. State of Georgia v. HammCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. State v. BelcherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API