United States v. Marvin Mandel
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Upon consideration of the defendants’ petition for another rehearing before the en banc court, 602 F.2d 653, en banc rehearing of 591 F.2d 1347, and the response of the United States, each of the judges in regular active service who is not disqualified having been polled, and it appearing that fewer than a majority of them have voted for it,
IT IS NOW ORDERED that the petition for another rehearing en banc before the enlarged court be, and it hereby is, denied.
2Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Douglas Lee Dunford, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. LurzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Irving T. Schwartz v. United States of America, (Three Cases). United States of America v. Marvin Mandel, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.