Legal Opinion
United States v. Lurz
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 10, 1981No. Nos. 80-5024, 80-5032, 80-5037 and 80-5048PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
Two counts in a criminal case brought in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland asserting drug violations here generate no less than eleven issues requiring resolution. Count I charged each of the original twenty-three defendants with conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, and possess phencyclidine (PCP), an offense under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Count II charged two of the defendants, Raymond Thomas Lurz, Jr. and Michael Roy Steedman, with conducting a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 848.
Following a trial of…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- United States v. David Allen Hagen Defusco, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. DeLunaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.