Legal Opinion
Hasenkamp v. The Shah Trust
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 20, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02226Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Michael Hasenkamp, No. CV-21-02226-PHX-DLR 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 The Shah Trust, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Michael Hasenkamp’s motion for preliminary 16 injunction. Defendants The Shah Trust, 21,000 Holdings LLC, and Edward Gunkel did 17 not respond, and the time to respond has passed. For the following reasons, the Court 18 grants the motion. 19 I. Background1 20 Since October 16, 2020, Plaintiff, his family, and his three dogs live in a rental home 21 owned…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Sarah B. Shields, Individually and as Representative of All Others Similarly Situated v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc., George F. Taylor and Irwin EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. LillyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BallardDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.